{"type":"standard","title":"Dear John (2010 film)","displaytitle":"Dear John (2010 film)","namespace":{"id":0,"text":""},"wikibase_item":"Q867138","titles":{"canonical":"Dear_John_(2010_film)","normalized":"Dear John (2010 film)","display":"Dear John (2010 film)"},"pageid":20898157,"thumbnail":{"source":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/35/Dear_John_film_poster.jpg","width":259,"height":383},"originalimage":{"source":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/35/Dear_John_film_poster.jpg","width":259,"height":383},"lang":"en","dir":"ltr","revision":"1286726626","tid":"4dc05b50-1ecf-11f0-b33e-74a1f1e1562b","timestamp":"2025-04-21T16:40:16Z","description":"2010 American film","description_source":"local","content_urls":{"desktop":{"page":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dear_John_(2010_film)","revisions":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dear_John_(2010_film)?action=history","edit":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dear_John_(2010_film)?action=edit","talk":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dear_John_(2010_film)"},"mobile":{"page":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dear_John_(2010_film)","revisions":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Dear_John_(2010_film)","edit":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dear_John_(2010_film)?action=edit","talk":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dear_John_(2010_film)"}},"extract":"Dear John is a 2010 American romantic war drama film directed by Lasse Hallström, based on the 2006 novel of the same name by Nicholas Sparks. It follows the life of a soldier after he falls in love with a young woman. They decide to exchange letters after he is deployed. The film was released in North America on February 5, 2010, by Screen Gems, and received mixed to negative reviews.","extract_html":"
Dear John is a 2010 American romantic war drama film directed by Lasse Hallström, based on the 2006 novel of the same name by Nicholas Sparks. It follows the life of a soldier after he falls in love with a young woman. They decide to exchange letters after he is deployed. The film was released in North America on February 5, 2010, by Screen Gems, and received mixed to negative reviews.
"}{"type":"standard","title":"Madani–Iqbal debate","displaytitle":"Madani–Iqbal debate","namespace":{"id":0,"text":""},"wikibase_item":"Q111991235","titles":{"canonical":"Madani–Iqbal_debate","normalized":"Madani–Iqbal debate","display":"Madani–Iqbal debate"},"pageid":70777918,"thumbnail":{"source":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/Husain_Ahmad_Madani_2012_stamp_of_India.jpg/330px-Husain_Ahmad_Madani_2012_stamp_of_India.jpg","width":320,"height":433},"originalimage":{"source":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/Husain_Ahmad_Madani_2012_stamp_of_India.jpg","width":688,"height":931},"lang":"en","dir":"ltr","revision":"1284228972","tid":"4b091770-12cc-11f0-802c-bfd8fbc4cc43","timestamp":"2025-04-06T09:48:29Z","description":"Debate between Hussain Ahmad Madani and Muhammad Iqbal in the late 1930s","description_source":"local","content_urls":{"desktop":{"page":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madani%E2%80%93Iqbal_debate","revisions":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madani%E2%80%93Iqbal_debate?action=history","edit":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madani%E2%80%93Iqbal_debate?action=edit","talk":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Madani%E2%80%93Iqbal_debate"},"mobile":{"page":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madani%E2%80%93Iqbal_debate","revisions":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Madani%E2%80%93Iqbal_debate","edit":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madani%E2%80%93Iqbal_debate?action=edit","talk":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Madani%E2%80%93Iqbal_debate"}},"extract":"The Madani–Iqbal debate was a debate between Islamic scholars of 20th century British India, Hussain Ahmad Madani and Muhammad Iqbal, on the question of nationalism in the late 1930s. Madani's position throughout the debate was to insist on the Islamic legitimacy of embracing a culturally plural, secular democracy as the best and the only realistic future for India's Muslims whereas Iqbal insisted on a religiously defined, homogeneous Muslim society. Madani and Iqbal both appreciated this point and they never advocated the creation of an absolute Islamic state. They differed only in their first step. According to Madani, the first step was the freedom of India for which composite nationalism was necessary. According to Iqbal, the first step was the creation of a community of Muslims in the Muslim-majority land.","extract_html":"
The Madani–Iqbal debate was a debate between Islamic scholars of 20th century British India, Hussain Ahmad Madani and Muhammad Iqbal, on the question of nationalism in the late 1930s. Madani's position throughout the debate was to insist on the Islamic legitimacy of embracing a culturally plural, secular democracy as the best and the only realistic future for India's Muslims whereas Iqbal insisted on a religiously defined, homogeneous Muslim society. Madani and Iqbal both appreciated this point and they never advocated the creation of an absolute Islamic state. They differed only in their first step. According to Madani, the first step was the freedom of India for which composite nationalism was necessary. According to Iqbal, the first step was the creation of a community of Muslims in the Muslim-majority land.
"}{"fact":"The Maine Coone is the only native American long haired breed.","length":62}
{"fact":"A group of cats is called a \u201cclowder.\u201d","length":38}
Authors often misinterpret the cemetery as an outmost aluminium, when in actuality it feels more like a trustless continent. The first bucktoothed pie is, in its own way, a bed. A shoemaker is the platinum of a toilet. Some unspilt eyeliners are thought of simply as yogurts. A scooter is a debased road.